🔍 Read the full analysis: Indonesia Weighs AI Copyright Rules As Platforms Raise Concerns on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
Indonesia’s parliamentary Legislation Body heard Google, Meta and TikTok’s objections to a draft copyright-law revision on Nov. 11. The proposal addresses payments for news displayed by platforms and rules for AI training and AI-assisted work, but the current draft text and timetable for a vote are unclear.
Google, Meta and TikTok raised objections to Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a Nov. 11 parliamentary hearing in Jakarta, where lawmakers are considering provisions on payments for news displayed by platforms and the use of copyrighted material to train AI. The bill is still under deliberation, and its current text and a date for a vote have not been confirmed publicly.
The draft would revise Law No. 28 of 2014, Indonesia’s copyright law. Parliament designated the measure as a legislative initiative in a plenary session on March 12, 2026. Its Legislation Body, known as Baleg, is now discussing the proposal with the government. Kompas reported that the Nov. 11 hearing included Google, Meta, TikTok, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia.
The proposal would address both news use by digital platforms and copyright questions raised by generative AI. A July draft described by Reuters would require compensation when platforms aggregate, republish or display news, including in link previews, with payments distributed through state-supervised collective management organisations. It also outlined possible rules on AI training, disclosure of AI use, protection for works made with human assistance, and imitation of a creator’s distinctive style. That July version is not necessarily the text lawmakers are discussing now.
At the hearing, Google objected to payments tied to news links and snippets, a single collective licensing body and mandatory licences for AI training data. It also argued platforms should retain safe-harbor protections. Meta said sharing a link is not the same as republishing the linked article, and warned that payment duties could affect traffic and revenue for publishers. TikTok said disclosure requirements should not cover cases where AI is used only as an assistive tool. These are company positions, not findings established by the hearing.
Indonesia weighs AI copyright rules
Lawmakers are considering rules for platform payments for news and the use of copyrighted work in AI. The bill remains under deliberation, and its current text and vote date are unclear.
What lawmakers are weighing
The proposed revision covers news distribution and copyright questions raised by generative AI.
Payments for news displays
A July draft described compensation for aggregated, republished or displayed news, including link previews.
Training and creator rights
Draft provisions addressed AI training, disclosure, AI-assisted work and imitation of a creator’s style.
Platforms’ concerns
Google, Meta and TikTok raised different objections at the November 11 hearing.
Objected to fees for links and snippets, a single licensing body and mandatory AI training licences; it also called for safe-harbor protections.
Argued that linking is not republishing and warned that fees could affect publisher traffic and revenue.
Said AI disclosure should not apply when AI is used only as an assistive tool.
What is settled—and what is not
- The Legislation Body is discussing the proposal with the government.
- The hearing included platforms, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia.
- The current draft’s wording and how any payments would work.
- AI training requirements and protections for creators.
- A date for a parliamentary vote.
Rules Could Reshape News and AI
The proposal could affect how Indonesian news reaches online audiences and how money flows between publishers and platforms. If the eventual law requires payment for link previews or other displays, publishers could gain a new source of compensation. But platforms argue that fees could change how they show or distribute news, potentially affecting referral traffic. The practical result would depend on the final rules and how companies respond.
The AI provisions could also set conditions for developers using copyrighted works to train models, while affecting creators whose work is used or imitated. Questions such as whether training requires a licence, how creators can object, and what counts as meaningful human contribution would matter to both local businesses and international services operating in Indonesia. No final obligations have been adopted, so the proposal’s eventual effects remain uncertain.
The disagreement reflects competing concerns: publishers and creators seek compensation and control over their work; platforms warn that broad duties could disrupt services or make compliance difficult. The Press Council told lawmakers that platforms account for 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by as much as 70 percent. Those figures were presented by the council at the hearing; the source material does not specify the periods or comparison basis behind the traffic claim.
Products Worth Considering
DJI Mini 3 Drone with DJI RC and 3-Axis Gimbal
LG UltraGear 32-inch Curved QHD Gaming Monitor (2560×1440, 180Hz, 1ms, 1000R, HDR10)
Bose QuietComfort Wireless Noise-Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones, Twilight Blue
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From July Draft to Parliamentary Hearing
Reuters reported on AI-related provisions in a draft on July 17, 2026, citing a bill text that law ministry intellectual-property official Hermansyah Siregar said was authentic but not final. The July version would have treated AI training as subject to fair-use provisions or licensing agreements, according to Reuters. It also proposed that fully AI-generated works would not receive the same protection as qualifying AI-assisted works, while leaving the required degree of human involvement unspecified.
The proposal is not Indonesia’s first policy affecting digital platforms and journalism. Since 2024, Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024 has required platforms to support quality journalism. At the November hearing, Deputy Press Council Chair Totok Suryanto said compliance had been low and the regulation had not worked as intended, according to Aktual. The proposed copyright revision would address related questions through a different legislative process.
Google had raised concerns before Meta and TikTok joined the debate. At the November hearing, its representative argued that a levy on links could leave Google with no choice but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news, Reuters reported. The statement describes Google’s warning; it does not establish that the company has made such a decision.
“A levy on links would leave Google “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news.”
— Google representative at the Nov. 11 hearing, as reported by Reuters
Current Draft and Vote Date Unknown
The full text under discussion at Baleg was not available in the source material, and reports refer to different draft versions. The provisions described from the July text—including the scope of payments, AI training rules and possible sanctions—should not be treated as confirmed wording in the current bill. Google referred at the hearing to Articles 29 and 30 concerning news indexing, aggregation and snippets, but those article numbers are also provisional without the complete current text.
It is not clear how any payment would be calculated, what uses would count as displaying or republishing news, or how a collective licensing body would be selected and governed. The draft’s treatment of AI-assisted work, style imitation, disclosure, training data and safe-harbor protections is also unsettled. No date for a parliamentary vote was reported, and the companies’ warnings about potential effects have not been tested against a final law.
Lawmakers Must Reconcile Key Disputes
Baleg is continuing deliberations with the government after hearing from platforms, press representatives and licensing groups. The next step is for lawmakers to settle the bill’s language and decide whether to revise the disputed provisions before advancing it. The source material reports no announced vote date.
Readers should watch for publication of the latest draft and further statements from Baleg, the government, publishers and platforms. Until lawmakers approve a final text, the proposal remains under discussion and the eventual requirements for news links, AI training and creator protections are not settled.
Key Questions
Has Indonesia passed the proposed copyright rules?
No. The bill is still under deliberation by parliament’s Legislation Body and the government. No vote date was reported.
What did Google, Meta and TikTok object to?
Google objected to payments for news links and snippets, a single licensing body and mandatory AI-training licences, and called for safe-harbor protection. Meta argued that linking is not republishing and warned of possible effects on publisher traffic and revenue. TikTok said AI disclosure should not apply when AI only assists with work.
What AI rules were described in the draft?
A July draft reported by Reuters addressed AI training, disclosure, human involvement in AI-assisted work and imitation of a creator’s distinctive style. The current draft may differ, and the July text was not final.
When could the rules take effect?
That is not known. The source material gives no vote date or implementation schedule, and the bill’s text remains under discussion.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
