Legal Operations

A disclosed test of 42 AI setups found uneven legal accuracy, with errors in deadlines and citations. Its publisher warns the results are a spot check.

An EU court adviser says chatbots may infringe publishers’ rights in some cases, but his proposed test may not favor the publisher suing Google.

Z.ai’s GLM-5.3-FlashX-Legal ranks seventh of 81 models on Vals AI’s leaderboard, but completes every criterion on about one in five tasks.

A South Korean court survey found many judges had encountered false or distorted citations and called for rules on verification, AI disclosure and fines.

The University of Kentucky approved an employee’s request not to personally use AI at work, citing a religious accommodation under Title VII.

A proposed AI tool would turn investigators’ notes, photos and GPS logs into draft reports. Its courtroom suitability and time savings remain untested.

Anthropic’s IPO filing follows a $1.5 billion book-copyright settlement and new author lawsuits. The court’s ruling and current claims differ.

A Top Class Actions headline says a class action accuses Grok of violating Illinois privacy law, but the complaint and case status are unavailable.

A Crypto Briefing headline reports Jess Asato is suing xAI over Grok deepfakes and consent. The filing details and xAI’s response are not available.

A report says a court rejected xAI’s bid to send SuperGrok cancellation allegations to arbitration. The court, ruling and claims remain unidentified.