🔍 Read the full analysis: What It Costs To Retire Around The World: I Fact-Checked The Viral $2 Million Graphic on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
A viral graphic lists annual retirement costs and savings targets for 18 countries, with a $2 million figure for the United States. Its totals consistently multiply annual costs by 25, but the underlying cost estimates cannot be verified because the graphic provides no source or definitions. The calculation also omits state pensions and may be too optimistic for people retiring at 50 or 55.
A viral graphic listing retirement budgets for 18 countries uses a consistent calculation but gives no source for its cost estimates, according to a review published November 4 by ThorstenMeyerAI.com. Its headline U.S. target of $2 million is based on multiplying $80,000 in annual spending by 25, while omitting state pensions and leaving unclear whether the budget is for one person or a couple.
The graphic, signed “The Business Guy,” lists annual costs including $80,000 for the United States, $55,000 for the United Kingdom, $24,000 for Thailand and $14,000 for Kenya. The corresponding savings totals are each approximately 25 times the annual figure: for example, $80,000 becomes $2 million and $24,000 becomes $600,000. That matches the arithmetic of the so-called 4% rule, which uses a 4% initial withdrawal from savings and adjusts withdrawals for inflation.
The review says it could not find a source, method note or traceable author for the annual cost estimates. It therefore does not establish that those budgets are false; it says they cannot be independently verified from the graphic. Key assumptions are also absent, including whether costs cover a single person or a couple, whether housing is rented or owned, and whether taxes and health insurance are included.
For comparison, the review cites the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey: in 2025, households headed by someone 65 or older spent an average of $64,445 and had 1.7 people on average; 78% owned their home. Households headed by someone aged 55 to 64 spent $85,442. These figures offer a reference point, but do not settle what the graphic’s $80,000 is meant to cover.
Pensions Change the Savings Target
The graphic treats the full annual budget as money that must come from savings, although many retirees receive government pensions. The review applies that missing income to the U.S. example: the Social Security Administration estimates an average benefit of $3,355 a month for an aged couple where both receive benefits, starting in January 2027. That is $40,260 a year. If the couple spends $80,000 annually, the remaining $39,740 multiplied by 25 gives a savings target of about $993,500, rather than $2 million.
That is an illustrative calculation, not a personalized forecast. It assumes the couple receives the stated average benefit and that $80,000 is the relevant annual budget. The review also notes that, using a longer-retirement multiplier discussed by Morningstar, the same gap would imply about $1.2 million. The gap between these figures shows why a single viral total can mislead readers making plans around their own pension eligibility, household and retirement date.
Moving abroad does not automatically make a listed budget achievable. The review says visa income tests may exceed the graphic’s estimated living costs: the Mexican consulate in Las Vegas, for example, requests monthly income of $4,630 per person for temporary residence, roughly twice the graphic’s stated annual-cost estimate when compared on a monthly basis. Eligibility rules and costs vary by location and can change, so a country’s budget figure alone does not show whether a retiree can qualify to live there.
Products Worth Considering
Anker SOLIX C300 Portable Power Station, 288Wh
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen), Wireless Bluetooth Noise-Cancelling Over-Ear Headphones, Black
Bose TV Speaker Compact Soundbar with Bluetooth and HDMI-ARC, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the 25-Times Rule Works
The 4% rule is a retirement-planning guideline, not a country-by-country cost survey. It generally describes taking 4% of a portfolio in the first year and adjusting withdrawals for inflation in later years, with the original framework aimed at a retirement lasting about 30 years. Multiplying annual spending by 25 is the arithmetic counterpart of that initial withdrawal rate.
That time horizon matters for people who stop working earlier. The review cites Morningstar’s 2025 retirement-income research, which gives safe starting withdrawal rates of 3.9% for 30 years, 3.5% for 35 years and 3.3% for 40 years in its stated base case. Those correspond to roughly 25.6, 28.6 and 30.3 times annual spending. The figures are model-based estimates, not guarantees that a portfolio will last.
The review also compares country figures with its own price-level model and says Spain and Costa Rica have the same modeled price level, although the graphic places Costa Rica’s annual cost 42% below Spain’s. That comparison raises questions about whether the graphic applies a consistent method across countries. The source does not provide enough detail to reproduce its estimates or assess what explains the difference.
“The arithmetic is right. Almost everything that matters is missing: a source, a definition of who is retiring, and state pensions.”
— Thorsten Meyer, ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Missing Inputs Limit the Comparison
The graphic’s author, underlying data and calculation method are not identified in the material reviewed. Without those details, readers cannot verify whether annual budgets include housing, health care, taxes, or other major expenses, or whether the amounts refer to individuals or households. The review says the figures are not proven false; their accuracy remains unverified.
The pension examples also rely on assumptions. The U.S. figure is an average estimate for a particular type of couple, while the UK figure assumes two people qualify for the full new State Pension. Neither amount necessarily describes a reader’s benefits, and pension eligibility ages matter: payments beginning at 67 do not cover someone who retires at 55. Exchange rates can also affect comparisons between dollar budgets and benefits stated in pounds.
The review describes the graphic’s country comparisons as potentially inconsistent, but the full data and methodology needed to independently reproduce its price-level analysis are not supplied in the source material. It is also unclear what evidence the graphic’s creator used, or whether the graphic will be corrected.
Check Personal Costs and Benefits
People using the figures for retirement planning would need to check their expected pension benefits, retirement age, household size, housing costs, health coverage, taxes and visa eligibility. The country totals should be treated as unverified estimates, not as a substitute for a personal budget or a plan built around a specific withdrawal period.
The next step in evaluating the viral graphic would be publication of its source data and definitions. Until then, the arithmetic can be checked, but the underlying costs cannot. Retirement planners considering an early exit should also compare assumptions for 35- or 40-year withdrawals rather than relying automatically on a 25-times multiplier.
Key Questions
Yes, as arithmetic: $80,000 multiplied by 25 equals $2 million. That does not verify whether $80,000 is a sound annual retirement budget or whether the total fits a particular person’s circumstances.
Why does the review say the U.S. savings target could be lower?
It subtracts an estimated $40,260 in annual Social Security benefits for an aged couple where both receive benefits from the assumed $80,000 budget. Multiplying the remaining $39,740 by 25 produces about $993,500. The example depends on benefit and spending assumptions and is not an individual estimate.
Does the 4% rule work for someone retiring at 50 or 55?
The cited Morningstar research uses lower starting withdrawal rates for longer retirement periods: 3.5% for 35 years and 3.3% for 40 years, compared with 3.9% for 30 years in its base case. The figures are estimates, not guarantees, but indicate that a 25-times target may be too low for some early retirees.
Can I use the country figures to decide where to retire?
Not reliably on their own. The graphic does not say whether costs include rent, insurance or taxes, and it does not clarify whether the budgets cover one person or a couple. Visa requirements, personal pension income and local costs also affect whether a destination is feasible.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
