TL;DR
Get the latest gadgets delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
The Tor Project says it will continue its technical collaboration with Mullvad after concerns about a political donation by a Mullvad co-founder. Tor is pausing proactive co-branding, reviewing how Mullvad Browser is described on its channels and says the collaboration must not compromise its mission or independence.
The Tor Project will continue its technical collaboration with Mullvad, despite community concerns prompted by a political donation from a Mullvad co-founder. In a statement, Tor said it is pausing proactive co-branding and revising language on its own channels to make clear that technical work does not imply broader endorsement or shared values.
Tor said its decision followed a due diligence process that included discussions with community members, staff and the board, a staff survey, and financial analysis and scenario planning. The organization acknowledged that some people have called for the relationship to end, while others have raised concerns about the effect that ending it could have on Tor’s work and the communities that rely on its tools.
The project described the collaboration as narrowly scoped technical work. It said the work has helped improve the structure, maintainability and auditability of Tor Browser’s codebase, brought in feedback from users outside Tor Browser’s core audience, and provided a lower-risk setting for testing features that may later benefit Tor Browser. Tor also said Mullvad Browser gives people access to another free, open-source privacy tool designed for different user needs.
Tor said it has paused joint promotional activity with Mullvad and reviewed how Mullvad Browser is described and endorsed on Tor-owned channels. It has clarified wording that could suggest wider agreement between the organizations’ values. The statement did not say the technical collaboration had ended or provide a new end date for the work.
How Tor Is Separating Work From Endorsement
The decision affects how Tor balances its human rights mission with collaboration that it says supports tools used by privacy-conscious people. Continuing the technical work could preserve software improvements and testing opportunities, while the promotional changes are intended to reduce the impression that Tor endorses Mullvad more broadly.
Tor also acknowledges a cost: some community members may lose trust because the relationship continues. That matters to an organization whose work depends on public confidence, contributors and cooperation across the privacy and anti-censorship fields. The statement presents the choice as a trade-off, not as a claim that the concerns have been resolved.
For users, the immediate distinction is between collaboration on software and public promotion. Tor says the former will continue under a limited agreement, while it is stepping back from proactive joint branding. The statement does not describe changes to the availability of either browser.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Donation Prompted Questions
The statement responds to questions about a political donation by a Mullvad co-founder and what Tor’s funding relationship with the company means for its human rights commitments. The source statement does not specify the donation’s recipient, amount or date, so those details cannot be established from the material provided.
Tor framed its mission as defending privacy, anonymity, free expression and access to information, while saying it opposes rhetoric that threatens other human rights and freedoms. It said this work is severely under-resourced and often relies on cooperation between organizations. In explaining its decision, Tor said its collaborations must serve its mission and must not compromise the project’s independence.
The statement also recognizes that Mullvad may benefit from the association, and that this is difficult for some in the Tor community to accept. Tor did not present continued technical work as evidence of full political or values alignment. Instead, it described the promotional changes as a way to make the relationship more accurate and avoid implied endorsement.
“We are not terminating the relationship but are setting clear boundaries on our relationship with Mullvad.”
— The Tor Project
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Questions About the Boundaries
The statement does not identify the political donation’s recipient, amount or timing, or provide further details about the co-founder’s role in Mullvad. It also does not publish the financial analysis or scenario planning behind Tor’s decision, nor specify the full terms or duration of the technical agreement.
It remains unclear how Tor will assess whether the collaboration continues to serve its mission, or what circumstances could lead it to change course. The statement says community concerns are shaping its path forward but gives no timetable for further review. It also does not report whether Mullvad has responded to Tor’s announcement.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Tor’s Review and Public Messaging
For now, Tor says it will continue the technical work under its narrowly scoped agreement, while keeping proactive co-branding paused and using revised descriptions on its own channels. The statement gives no schedule for a new decision or a return to joint promotion.
Tor says it will continue listening to community members whose concerns shaped its review. Any further changes to the partnership, agreement or public messaging have not been announced. The project’s next stated responsibility is to maintain the boundary it has described: technical collaboration must support its work without implying broader endorsement or weakening its independence.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
Is the Tor Project ending its relationship with Mullvad?
No. Tor says it will continue the technical collaboration, while setting limits on promotion and endorsement.
What changes has Tor announced?
Tor has paused proactive co-branding and joint promotional activity and revised language on its own channels that could suggest broader values alignment.
Why did the relationship come under scrutiny?
Tor said questions followed a political donation by a Mullvad co-founder. The supplied statement does not give the donation’s recipient, amount or date.
What does Tor say the technical collaboration has achieved?
Tor says it has improved Tor Browser’s code structure, maintainability and auditability, widened user feedback, and offered a lower-risk setting to test features that may later benefit Tor Browser.
Has Tor said when it will review the decision again?
No review date or end date for the technical agreement was provided. Tor says community concerns are shaping its path forward, but further timing and criteria remain unspecified.
Source: hn
Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day Picks
long weekend sales
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
